
Jeremy's Run-Brookie by Rebecca Haydock

Jeremy's Run-Brookie by Rebecca Haydock

The Harriet~Diving Caddis by G. Muncy
As recorded numbers of licensed anglers on Montana streams dwindles, this may seem great to locals and anyone seeking solitude. Of course, dwindling fly fishermen means less revenues for businesses and most importantly a greater burden on advocates for the habitat (locals and from a far). Once the put and take folks and the older generation dwindle away, then it is left for voices to emerge from the ‘bums’. Voices won’t be enough, as coordination of voices, legislators and biologists will have to be coordinated by the new generations. Yes, maybe financial hard times influence travel, rooms, food, licenses and gear but that is now…these visitor numbers have been falling away in Western States for awhile. Who will emerge in Montana and elsewhere….fresh faces, fresh times they say. Numbers often equal power or a concerted pressure. If numbers are down then the challenge is a more educated, directed voice in accessing decision making power.

The Alaska Chronicles (Hatches Magazine Pic)
This is an example of my geographical knowledge shortcomings: Greenland. Recently, I noticed I had visits from Greenland. ? Greenland? My grade school geography lessons had failed me once again or more my middle age long term memory…Greenland and fishing? Certainly, it must be some ice bound village, where hearty souls venture forth for Cod or some such endeavor. This blog, and the research that goes with it, has taught me so much about fly fishing around the world. Places I will never get to go, but where others live and other lucky fishers go.

“Greenland is a char fishing paradise. Although this awe-inspiring wilderness is fairly new on our angling list, it is fast becoming a firm favourite amongst our clients. Our reindeer hunters have been returning full of praise for what they have experienced there, and so too are the growing number of anglers. This is ‘frontier fishing’ at its most exciting!”
And, it is apparent it is a remote venue: “We highly recommend an emergency evacuation membership for this trip. It costs well over $100,000 to be air lifted to a safe US hospital from many parts of the world. These services will not be covered by general travel insurance or medical insurance.”

Beautiful Images..Sisimiut, Greenland

Greenland

Ok, it appears from the alarmism on every topic anymore that one has to elevate one’s crisis to a higher level than everyone else’s crisis. I find that annoying and harmful to people sorting through the Al Gore like bullshit to find true environmental-habitat issues. The ocean fisheries appear to be a legitimate enviro issue given the declining numbers. It appears to be an issue with which the oft vaunted ‘global community’ (gag) can agree on restorative measures to protect and restore fisheries and to form consensus that will actually show improvements. It appears this is being done in areas around the North Sea/Great Britain. I need to learn more about the successes and lapses of these endeavors.
But, Greenpeace thugs, whether on land or sea, need their collective heads cracked. Oh my, can’t say that? Screw them and the ship they road in on. Where in the hell is a Somali Pirate ship when you need one?
The Ocean Fisheries are in peril and the immediacy of the problem appears more demonstrable than many of the perils we are berated upon ad nauseum. This is an issue that eco hand wringers can settle upon; that fisher’s of all stripe can join forces with…careful because PETA will be standing next to you with Greenpeace….
“Such is the human feeding frenzy, there may come a time when there are no fish left to catch. In 2006, a study in the US journal Science warned that every single species we exploit would have collapsed by 2048 if populations continued to decline as they had since the 1950s. By 2003, nearly a third of all species had collapsed, the study found – meaning their numbers were down 90% or more on historic maximum catch levels. Extrapolate that on a graph, and the downward curve reaches 100% just before 2050. That prognosis – now disputed – was based on a four-year study of fish populations, catch records and ocean ecosystems.
“We really see the end of the line now,” said the author Boris Worm of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, at the time. “It will be in our lifetime. Our children will see a world without seafood, if we do not change things.” Many imagined a world where there would be no fish protein left to eat apart from jellyfish and marine algae.”
Perhaps a real issue? Most probably a real issue? While you worry about melting polar ice caps, rising seas, CO2 emissions, etc etc..factor in some mental energy for a more demonstrable problem: the ocean fisheries.