Archive for April 6th, 2008

06
Apr
08

Sunday tying

The ubiquitous GRHE (Gold Ribbed Hare’s Ear) made from the mask of a rabbit/hare. I did not use rabbit for the tail, but rather hackle fibers. I am very allergic anymore to rabbit fur. Here, I used Kudra fur for the abdomen and rabbit for the thorax and pheasant tail for the wingcase.   

 

(Left) I have had great success with this black & grey basic nymph. It has worked for years in either lakes or rivers. The tail and hackle are black and the abdomen and thorax are grey Kudra fur. It is ribbed with copper wire.

 

This was suppose to be a Timberline Emerger and I infused more radical hairs for breathability and life. I used chickabou for the tail and Kudra fur for the abdomen, then hackle tips for the wing and crazy fibers for the thorax.

 

06
Apr
08

More Czech Nymph Info

You Cz Nymphing researchers may know of Jan Siman in Cz. Today, I received an email ad for his site. It is sooooo unfortunate the US $/Euro exchange rate is so out of whack. The new hooks on this site are fun to envision as tying components…yet $11.50 US per 5 pack is a bit steep sorry to say. US hook distibutors (are there really any) need to get with it! They are so stuck in a rut re innovation  expectations and techniques…hence your interest in exploring a E. Euro technique…not even new…but only still ‘new’ here. It isn’t new, but it is not getting the resources it needs here. US distributors and fly shops need to lead for once…yet Japan, England, Swedish and Czech manufacturers lead? Shame.

http.//shop.siman.cz/    Jan Siman at Siman Ltd.   Check it out.

Cool hooks! Wish the costs were not as expensive for my taste. Still maybe you can afford it. Just FYI 

 

06
Apr
08

Czech Nymphing (Polish Nymph Too)

 

I checked my blog stat section and note the overwhelming majority of visitors are searching for Czech Nymphing information. I have fished this way since 1971. I did not know what it was called. I was fishing with a friend, who had grown up in Iowa, but travelled throughout Montana as a young man. We were on a section of the Warm Springs R. in Oregon, which could be fished then. Throughout the day, I fished dry flies or nymphed. At that time corkies and other strike indicators had not risen onto my radar. I nymphed by casting out my floating line and with ten+ feet of fly line and the then standard 9′ tapered leader swing through the currents I watched for my fly line to significantly jerk…my que to set the hook. I caught maybe two fish all day and to the dry fly…to a non-insect Royal Coachman. Remember, I had used a TDC for years and knew little about fishing.

My friend fished a short line with the fly line up off the water and the leader almost straight down into the currents. He swung his rod along with ease and caught many fish. So many that my competitive streak was severly tweaked and humbled. He seemed magically gifted as he casually and literally pulled one trout after another from the river.

Now there was my template to compare to and to copy. Alas, I sometimes did and sometimes did not. Part of the problem was steelhead fishing lead to my swinging a line through the currents and even if I did fish a shorter line I later ‘evolved’ to the newer fad of using strike indicators. That seemed logical…a bobber of sorts to key upon as the line drifted beyond any tight control.

Then the Brookes method caught my attention. I saw a man on the Crooked R. standing in one of the few heavy water sections working around a bigger boulder. He was high sticking and in direct control of his line and he pulled a large trout from the river. Unfortuanately he killed the fish…well over 24″….but the technique was etched as a way to get a big payoff. I did not enjoy wading bigger water. I have never liked having water above the hips or let along to the belly push me along….scares me terribly to be stuck in mid current and no way out…been there….don’t care for the emerging panic and adrenaline dump.

Anyway, I have since used the technique and in safer water. I have been very successful with it and until a few years ago had only used our standard US nymphs. I had imagined any mayfly, caddis, stonefly etc nymph is quite appropriate to the technique of Czech Nymphing. But those Cz Nymphs do look sooooo good. I do so much lake fishing that I wish they were more transferrable to lake fishing. I don’t think they would ride true in the depths…turning this way and that. But for river/stream fishing they are exciting to use and very productive so far (last two seasons).

So enough about me….check out the below info. Use varied materials and learn the Polish/Shuttle Weave. There are other names for the weaving technique too. Realize if you weight that curved shank hook just so it will drift upside down with the point up…much like nymphs tumble about subsurface.   

On March 16th, I wrote a post re Cz Nymphing and attached the below link, which describes how to do the weave. The weave is integral to the Polish Nymph and has been used for other nymph’s in the past. The material used determines how segmented or defined the body will look.     

http://www.flyguysoutfitting.com/shuttleweave.html




Below @ “The Past” you can search back to 2008 month by month

April 2008
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Please visit MUNCY DESIGNS (click)

Welcome to SwittersB & Exploring. Please Share, Comment & Like Away!

Please subscribe just below. Use the Search box to search topics.

Enter your email address to subscribe to the SwittersB blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,238 other followers

The Past

231!!! Countries Visiting SwittersB~Thank You!!!

free counters

Blog Stats: There are lies, damn lies and statistics

  • 4,833,666 Visits/Views (WP Original Stat~Pre Flag Counter Stats)

There’s No Accounting For Taste; Search the Blog for Much More. Thanks for Visiting!


%d bloggers like this: